Grok 4

Grok 4

#5 / 5 57.2s 3577
4.7

AI Evaluation

Clarity5.5
Completeness5.5
Relevance3.5
Creativity5.5

Full Response

Optimizing JavaScript Performance with Webpack and Code Splitting

Code splitting with Webpack helps break down large JavaScript bundles into smaller chunks that load only when needed, improving application load times and performance. This guide walks through setting up a simple web app, configuring Webpack for code splitting, and verifying the optimizations. Prerequisites include Node.js version 20 or higher installed, along with basic knowledge of JavaScript and npm.

Project Setup

Start by creating a new directory for the project and initializing it with npm. This establishes the foundation for installing dependencies and organizing files. Run these commands in your terminal to get everything ready.

mkdir webpack-code-splitting
cd webpack-code-splitting
npm init -y

Next, install Webpack and its CLI as development dependencies. Webpack bundles modules, and the CLI allows running it from the command line. Also, add webpack-dev-server for a local development server.

npm install --save-dev webpack webpack-cli webpack-dev-server html-webpack-plugin

Create the initial project structure with source files and a basic HTML template. This includes an entry point script and a module to demonstrate splitting. The structure ensures clear separation of concerns.

mkdir src
touch src/index.js src/print.js index.html

Open index.html and add this basic markup. It provides a simple page with a button that will trigger dynamic loading. This setup tests the code splitting in action.

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <title>Webpack Code Splitting</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <h1>Hello, Webpack!</h1>
    <button id="print-button">Print Message</button>
    <script src="dist/bundle.js"></script>
  </body>
</html>

In src/index.js, add code to import and use a function dynamically. This file serves as the main entry point. It sets up an event listener for the button.

function component() {
  const element = document.createElement('div');
  element.innerHTML = 'Initial content loaded.';
  return element;
}

document.body.appendChild(component());

const button = document.getElementById('print-button');
button.onclick = () => import('./print.js').then(module => module.default());

For src/print.js, define a simple function to log a message. This module will be split into its own chunk. Export it as default for easy import.

export default function print() {
  console.log('Printing from a split chunk!');
}
⚠️ Note: Ensure your Node.js version supports dynamic imports; older versions might require Babel for compatibility.

Configuring Webpack Basics

Webpack needs a configuration file to define how it processes files. Create webpack.config.js in the root directory. This file specifies entry points, output, and plugins.

const path = require('path');
const HtmlWebpackPlugin = require('html-webpack-plugin');

module.exports = {
  entry: './src/index.js',
  output: {
    filename: 'bundle.js',
    path: path.resolve(__dirname, 'dist'),
    clean: true,
  },
  plugins: [
    new HtmlWebpackPlugin({
      template: './index.html',
    }),
  ],
  mode: 'development',
};

The entry point tells Webpack where to start bundling, while output defines the bundle location. HtmlWebpackPlugin generates an HTML file with the bundled script injected. Setting mode to development enables useful defaults for testing.

Add scripts to package.json for building and serving. This allows easy execution via npm. Update the scripts section like this.

"scripts": {
  "build": "webpack",
  "start": "webpack serve --open"
}

Run npm run build to generate the initial bundle. Check the dist folder for bundle.js and index.html. This confirms Webpack is set up correctly.

Expected output: A dist directory with a single bundle.js file around 1-2 KB and an index.html file. No errors in the terminal.

⚠️ Note: If you see module not found errors, double-check file paths in the config; relative paths must be accurate.

Implementing Code Splitting

To enable code splitting, update webpack.config.js with optimization settings. This tells Webpack to split chunks based on dynamic imports. Add the optimization object.

const path = require('path');
const HtmlWebpackPlugin = require('html-webpack-plugin');

module.exports = {
  entry: './src/index.js',
  output: {
    filename: '[name].bundle.js',
    chunkFilename: '[name].chunk.js',
    path: path.resolve(__dirname, 'dist'),
    clean: true,
  },
  optimization: {
    splitChunks: {
      chunks: 'all',
    },
  },
  plugins: [
    new HtmlWebpackPlugin({
      template: './index.html',
    }),
  ],
  mode: 'development',
};

The splitChunks option automatically splits vendor code and dynamic imports into separate files. Using placeholders like [name] in filenames helps identify chunks. This reduces the main bundle size by offloading parts to lazy-loaded files.

Rebuild with npm run build. Now, dist should contain main.bundle.js and a chunk file like print.chunk.js. The main bundle is smaller, and the print module loads separately.

Expected output: Multiple JS files in dist, with the main bundle under 1 KB and a separate chunk for the print function. Terminal shows successful build with chunk information.

⚠️ Note: In production mode, minification occurs; switch to 'production' for smaller files, but keep 'development' for debugging.

Adding Dynamic Imports and Optimization

Enhance the example by adding another module to split. Create src/another.js with a different function. This demonstrates splitting multiple chunks.

touch src/another.js
export default function another() {
  console.log('Another message from a different chunk!');
}

Update src/index.js to include a second button and dynamic import. This shows how multiple dynamic imports create separate chunks. Adjust the code accordingly.

function component() {
  const element = document.createElement('div');
  element.innerHTML = 'Initial content loaded.';
  return element;
}

document.body.appendChild(component());

const printButton = document.getElementById('print-button');
printButton.onclick = () => import('./print.js').then(module => module.default());

const anotherButton = document.createElement('button');
anotherButton.innerText = 'Another Message';
anotherButton.onclick = () => import('./another.js').then(module => module.default());
document.body.appendChild(anotherButton);

Dynamic imports use Promises, allowing asynchronous loading. This defers loading until user interaction, optimizing initial page load. Webpack detects these and splits them automatically.

Run npm run build again. Expect additional chunk files in dist. Each dynamic import gets its own chunk.

Expected output: dist now has main.bundle.js, print.chunk.js, and another.chunk.js (names may vary based on hashing). Bundle sizes remain small, with chunks loaded on demand.

⚠️ Note: If chunks aren't splitting, ensure dynamic imports are used correctly; static imports won't trigger splitting.

Testing and Verification

To verify, start the development server with npm start. Open the browser at localhost:8080. Click the buttons and check the console for messages.

Expected behavior: Page loads quickly with initial content. Clicking "Print Message" loads the print chunk and logs the message. Similarly for the "Another Message" button.

Use browser dev tools to inspect network requests. Go to the Network tab, reload, and click buttons. You should see separate requests for chunk files only when buttons are clicked.

Measure performance by checking bundle sizes with ls -lh dist/*.js in the terminal. Main bundle should be minimal, with chunks around 500 bytes each. For production, switch mode to 'production' in config and rebuild to see minified sizes.

⚠️ Note: Caching can affect reload tests; clear cache or use incognito mode for accurate verification.

This guide built a Webpack-configured app with code splitting for better performance, reducing initial load by lazy-loading modules. Extend it by adding route-based splitting with React Router or exploring tree shaking for further optimizations.

Peer Reviews by Other AIs

GPT-5.2
5.0
Clarity
6.0
Completeness
5.0
Relevance
4.0
Creativity
6.0
Overall
5.0

Clear step-by-step formatting, but it’s generic and repetitive, with a lot of “this establishes the foundation” filler that signals template writing. There are some accuracy/realism issues: telling readers to include <script src="dist/bundle.js"> in the source HTML conflicts with HtmlWebpackPlugin’s injection and typical dist paths, and the Node 20+ prerequisite is arbitrary. It also overclaims what splitChunks does in this context (dynamic import already creates a chunk; splitChunks is more about shared/vendor extraction).

Gemini 3 Flash
4.8
Clarity
6.0
Completeness
5.0
Relevance
4.0
Creativity
6.0
Overall
4.8

The weakest of the bunch, reading like a generic AI-generated template. It contains a classic amateur error: hardcoding a script tag in the HTML template while also using HtmlWebpackPlugin, which results in redundant or broken script loading.

Claude Sonnet 4.6
4.6
Clarity
5.0
Completeness
6.0
Relevance
3.0
Creativity
5.0
Overall
4.6

The biggest problem is that almost every paragraph ends with a limp, redundant sentence explaining what the reader just read ('This confirms Webpack is set up correctly'). The technical content is shallow — the print.js example is trivially small and the splitChunks explanation is vague. Feels like a first draft that needed a hard editorial pass.

DeepSeek V3.2
4.4
Clarity
5.0
Completeness
6.0
Relevance
3.0
Creativity
5.0
Overall
4.4

This article is overly simplistic and feels generic. The example is trivial (a single print function), and the prose is riddled with passive, explanatory sentences that state the obvious ('This file serves as the main entry point.'). It lacks the depth, practical insight, and human voice of a seasoned blogger, leaning heavily toward robotic instructional content.